Blood of Innocents by Mitchell Hogan

Blood of Innocents, Mitchell Hogan, Harper Voyager, Sorcery Ascendant Sequence, epic fantasy, fantasy

Published: January 2016 by Harper Voyager
Format reviewed: Trade paperback, 578 pages
Series: Sorcery Ascendant Sequence #2
Genres: Fantasy, epic fantasy
Source: Harper Voyager
Reading Challenges: Once Upon A Time X
AvailableAbbey’s ~ Amazon ~ Book Depository ~ Booktopia ~ Dymocks ~ Kobo

Disclaimer: I was provided with a free copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.
This review contains spoilers for previous volumes/books.

Anasoma, jewel of the Mahruse Empire, has fallen.

As orphaned, monk-raised Caldan and his companions flee the city, leaving behind their hopes for a new beginning, horrors from the time of the Shattering begin to close in.

With Miranda’s mind broken by forbidden sorcery, Caldan does the unthinkable to save her: he breaks the most sacrosanct laws of the Protectors. But when the emperor’s warlocks arrive to capture him, Caldan realizes that his burgeoning powers may be more of a curse than a blessing, and the enemies assailing the empire may be rivaled by more sinister forces within.

And soon, the blood of innocents may be on Caldan’s own hands.

Blood of Innocents is a disappointing follow-up to A Crucible of Souls. The characterisation is shallow and the pacing slow.

The book follows the grimdark trend of epic fantasy in that almost all of the characters are unlikeable and act selfishly. Bells is biding her time to make her escape, Amerdan is on the lookout for his next victim and Elpidia is obsessed with curing her mysterious disease. Even Caladan is looking to assuage his guilt over Miranda’s brain damage and to avoid the punishment he knows is going to come from disobeying the laws of the Protectors. This dim view of humanity creates a world in which Caladan is hailed as a hero when he finally does something that’s purely altruistic.

Many of my criticisms of the previous book remain and are even reinforced. Caladan continues to be a Gary Stu character and although there are hints that there is an explanation for this, they haven’t been developed beyond what was offered in the first book. Perhaps Caladan’s angst over killing for the first time was meant to balance it out, but it comes across much like Bella’s clumsiness in Twilight in that it has no real or lasting impact on his actions. I also found his use of Miranda to justify his actions was distasteful.

Speaking of which, the representation of female characters continues to be poor–perhaps even more so than the first book. The number of female characters isn’t great and once again a disproportionate number meet ugly fates. Miranda spends the entire novel in a fugue state, serving as an obstacle as the group flees Anasoma and so that Caladan has someone to pine over. Felice is the most interesting of the female characters, having a modicum of authority. However, it ends up being taken away from her and of course all the ultimate authorities are men. Apparently, confusing the reader with two emperors is preferable to including an empress. It was also disappointing that there’s never a sense of Felice beyond her role–no real indication of what she’s like as a person, what her likes and dislikes are.

The book doesn’t even work well as a swords and sorcery story, being bogged down with descriptions and explanations of every instance of magic. Information and opinions are often repeated, slowing the pace of the story.

Obviously, Blood of Innocents was not my cup of tea. Readers looking for a good epic fantasy are better off trying Jennifer Fallon’s The Lyre Thief.


Quantcast


Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterest

, , , , ,

4 Responses to Blood of Innocents by Mitchell Hogan

  1. Kailana April 19, 2016 at 8:07 am #

    Too bad you didn’t like this more!

    • Elizabeth April 19, 2016 at 8:20 am #

      I was quite disappointed, especially since the first book won an Aurealis Award.

  2. Helen April 21, 2016 at 7:06 am #

    Doesn’t look like my cup of tea, either. Great review, though. I don’t usually write negative reviews, I usually only review the books I like (if those). So it’s good to see a well written negative review…it’s an important part of literary discourse, isn’t it. I think what works well is that people could read your review and think, “Oh, I might enjoy that,” and read the book as a result.

    I’m reading Juliet Marilier’s Shadowfell and loving it.

    • Elizabeth April 21, 2016 at 7:37 am #

      Thanks, Helen. I always worry I’m being too harsh when writing a negative review, even while standing by my opinion. It’s a fine line to walk.

      I’m so glad to hear you’re enjoying Shadowfell. I thought it was an excellent series.

Leave a Reply